Plan B Chp. 3

 http://static.wixstatic.com/media/03bf8c_801ce5ad94fa475ea9e364cc358883e5.png

In chapter 3 of Plan B, Brown discusses the waterfall effect of the increasing climate change on many different areas. He discusses how it effects the earth, our cities, our food supply and more. Climate change is becoming a huge problem. Brown begins the chapter by stating that ever since civilization began, each generation has left the next a planet similar to the one it inherited and ours is the first to break that tradition (Brown 55). Brown makes a very true statement here. There is no doubt that our generation uses, takes, and wastes more resources that it should. We are all about convenience and wanting the fastest results possible. More development. More profit. That is simply how most of our generation thinks.

 

http://images.sciencedaily.com/2009/07/090720163555-large.jpg

http://dornsife-blogs.usc.edu/natural-history-ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo.jpg

 

Brown gives the fact that we have had 25 of the warmest years in record history since 1980 (Brown 56). The climate change recently has become rapid and it is scary to think what will happen if it continues at this rate. The increasingly warm weather is causing ice and snow in mountain ranges to melt a lot faster and sooner. Brown makes a valid point in saying that we have taken the water storage from mountain ranges for granted simply because they have always been there, but as the earth gets warmer, these reservoirs are depleting (Brown 69). This water gives natural irrigation that many farming areas rely on. Without this natural flow of water, we would be in great trouble.

 

http://media.treehugger.com/assets/images/2011/10/plan-b-slideshow-goals-image.jpg

 

It is obvious that we have many challenges that have arisen concerning the environment. However, Brown comes off too strong in some areas of the text for me. The challenges we face are stabilize climate, stabilize population, eradicate poverty, and restore the earth’s natural systems (Brown 75). According to Brown, we have to “effectively respond to each of them at the same time” because of their mutual independence (Brown 75). I believe that is far too reaching of a task for us to accomplish. When you ask for too much, a lot of the time you do not get anything resolved. It is much better to go about things in little steps so that it is not overwhelming. In addition, some things, such as restoring earth’s natural system is impossible. We can never get the systems back to how they were naturally at this point.

 

http://studentenergy.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/wind-energy.jpg

 

Another area that Brown is unrealistic in his Plan B goal to replace all coal-fired power plants with wind farms by 2020. I know this book is outdated and it is obvious we are nowhere close to achieving this. However, even so, I do not think we can realistically get all the power to sustain today’s way of life with wind farms. We cannot rely on wind to power every our needs because it is a part of nature and nature is unpredictable. In addition, I think we just have way too much to power in today’s society to switch to relying on wind farms. He makes other unrealistic goals as well. In general, I just do not think he realizes society today is not able to make such drastic changes when they do not really see the threat since it is far in the future.

Plan B 4.0 Chp. 2

http://www.goodlifeconnoisseur.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Global-Water-Use-Forecast.png

     The second chapter of Plan B discusses the pressure of the growing population on land and water. Our food and water resources are becoming increasingly scarce as the population continues its rapid growth. There are many more mouths to feed now then there were a decade ago. This obviously affects both food and water because those are two vital resources needed for survival. Many countries are over pumping aquifers as they struggle to satisfy their growing water needs (Brown 38). Water seems to be a plentiful resource, but we are depleting it with our increasingly large demand. The competition for what has become a big problem, which is crazy to think because water is everywhere. However, simply because water is everywhere does not mean that we should not limit our use of it.

http://www.voalearningenglish.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Agriculture-Report-Special-Grain-May-Reduce-Iron-Deficiency.jpg

One point that Brown brings up really surprised me. Apparently, the price of grain is now tied to the price of oil because of our country’s massive capacity to convert grain to ethanol (Brown 49). This further brings the resource of food into perspective. Now grain is in a competition to go to either car fuel or people’s food. Obviously, gas companies can pay more to obtain grain since they make much more than the average person. So now grain is being taken from people to be used in ethanol. Also, we all know how gas prices fluctuate. Now every time gas prices rise so do the prices of grain, which makes food more expensive as well.

http://www.beezodogsplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/bike-vs-car1.jpg

     Because of the way grain is tied to oil, cars are now in competition with people for grain. Brown brings up how automobile owners on average make 27,000 more a year than poorest families (Brown 50). Automobile owners pay for gas so they are making their vote against the people that need grain for food. In this way, the market decides to fuel cars (Brown 50). I understand this because our society is ruled by profit; however, I disagree with the logic of it. Grain is a very important food group and simply because gas uses it does not mean that less should go to people as a food source. This country is scarce on food as it is and we do not need another reason for it.

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1895362/images/o-BRAIN-SWITCH-facebook.jpg

http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/files/2014/11/amos_climatechange2-940x626.jpg

            Brown ends the chapter saying that our choice is simple; we either need to reverse these trends or risk being overwhelmed by them (Brown 54). I do not believe it is that simple at all. Brown acts like we can just turn a switch and stop the way we are living. There is no possible way we can do that. There are too many people on earth that would need to cooperate together and even then it would be difficult. Also, we would have to change everyone’s mindsets. With all the advances we have made, we cannot just go back. We can slowly change and be more conservative but to continue operating society we need to utilize a certain amount of resources.

Food, Inc.

http://www.vermontvacation.com/-/media/Images/Articles/DiscoverVermont/Farms/VermontFarms.ashx?w=485&h=250&as=1

 
     Right of the bat, Food, Inc. states that the way we eat has changed more in the past 50 years than it did in the previous ten thousand. This is such a dramatic statement and it really made me think. The way we eat has become much different from a decade ago, but I did not realize the reality of how greatly it has changed. Our food is no longer as fresh as it used to be. People want what is quick and easy. Our fast paced society has greatly impacted how food is processed. However, as it states in the video the images used to sell food still picture the agrarian lifestyle to make it seem like that is where our food comes from when in reality huge factories process the food. 

 

http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/660/cache/chicken-farm-essick_66070_990x742.jpg

 

http://www.magissue.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Meat-Industry.jpg

 

It shocked me that the meat industry is dominated four huge multinational corporations, from which McDonalds are the main customers. So basically, even if you do not get fast food, you are getting the same product. Most people are unaware of where their food comes from because there is a veil over what these corporations do not want us to see. I agree that much is hidden from us. Most people just do not care because what they are getting is simple and easy.

 

http://www.jobswithfood.com/organicstamp.jpg

 

Another interesting thing that I learned was that the organic food area is growing twenty percent annually. This is great because it is showing that people are starting to take more care into what they purchase and what they eat. Organic food may be expensive but if it grows and more start to buy it, more will be made and eventually it will become cheaper. Also, it was surprising to learn that Stoneyfield was started by a small group of environmentalists against all the pollution that the huge businesses were creating. Their yogurt is the number three in America.

 

Plan B 4.0: Preface and Chp. 1

http://world.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hunger.jpg

http://3stepsadd.com/premium/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/MG_2491CElevitch.jpeg

     Plan B 4.0 is all about mobilizing to save the environment. In the preface and beginning chapter, the opens the discussion and gives a summary on what this means as well as an introduction to the big plan. It pinpoints food as the weak link because we are entering a “new food era” with higher prices, growing numbers of people and intensifying competition for resources (Brown Preface). It is very true that we do not have nearly enough food to support the amount of people here on earth. The food is also unevenly distributed. We waste so much food by throwing it out or having it go bad when there are millions of people in other areas that need it. Some people have an abundance of food while others are starving. We need food to survive and it is a huge problem that we do not have enough of it for everybody.

http://forcechangecom.c.presscdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/1412_1_3802.jpg

 

Continuing on with the scarcity of food, the author begins to discuss different ways that we can fix this problem. Some people “point to genetically modified crops as a way out of this predicament” (Brown 8). I do not believe that this is the answer to our food problem. Genetically modifying our food to make it more nutritious or bigger or whatever else just is not natural. It may be a viable option and one that works, but I do not think this should be used. I do not like the thought of engineering our food to fix our problem or meet our needs. Food grown out of nature should not be tampered with in my opinion. I want natural nutrients not added ones.

http://www.conserve-energy-future.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Overpopulated_Earth.jpg

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/theres-too-many-people-on-this-earth-we-need-a-plague.jpg

There is no question that the world’s overpopulation contributes greatly to our food problem. There are simply too many people on the world. As Dwight on the TV show The Office would put it, “we need a new plague”. Families are having too many children that they simply cannot afford and that the world cannot support. Cities and suburbs alike are overcrowded. Traffic is horrible. There are just too many bodies on this earth. Too many babies are being made and people are living much longer. The Plan B goal is to stabilize population at eight billion or lower because as of now the predictions are that the population will reach 9.2 billion by 2050 (Brown 24). Population definitely needs to be stabilized or lowered if possible. Less people would solve so many of our problems.

http://www.savagechickens.com/images/chickeninstant.jpg

 

With a happy ending to the first chapter, the author states, "a world where population has stabilized, forests are expanding, and carbon emissions are falling is within our grasp" (Brown 27). I believe this is too optimistic. We have such a long way to go. And frankly, many people just do not care to put in the amount of effort that Plan B is calling for. People in today’s world are far too selfish and focused on instant gratification. Plan B will have slow progress and the results will not be seen any time soon but in years beyond us. Because of this, I just do not believe enough people are willing to work and take the time out of their day to change for the better of our environment.

Shiva: Biodiversity

http://www.cbd.int/undb/celebrations/ph/acb-poster1.jpg

       In this excerpt, Shiva discussed biodiversity and its erosion because of mankind’s domination. Shiva believes that biodiversity is very important for maintaining and creating life. Even the smallest microbe “plays a critical role in maintaining the ecological processes that create the conditions of life for all species, including, of course, our own” (Shiva 41). Each organism was put on this earth for a reason. Every single living thing has a role to play in the ecological system. Some of these roles may not be obvious or seen with our eyes but that does not mean they are not there. Even insects have an important role in the cycle of life. We need diversity in life to survive. A species may not seem necessary to us, but it is to some other species. Tampering with the cycle of life and biodiversity can be a dangerous move, which is something many do not realize since it is all about us in today’s world.

http://a.static.trunity.net/files/130801_130900/130806/thumbs/reeffish-600px_438x0_scale.jpg

http://cdn.orkin.com/images/mosquitoes/mosquito-illustration_360x286.jpg

     I support that all living things do have a reason even though people, including me, may not personally see the reason. Especially with insects, I have trouble seeing their reason for existence. I do admit this is mostly because I hate bugs and do not want them near me. With that being said, I do not believe that all life forms have “a right to evolve freely on their own terms” (Shiva 40). Pertaining to insects of all kinds, if their own terms involves being a bother to me, I do not hesitate to kill them. The fact that there are 950,000 species of insects repulses me. It makes it hard to agree that they all have intrinsic value, but I know they do.

http://media.campustimes.org/2013/04/privateproperty2.jpg

  

     According to Shiva, one of the causes of the loss of biodiversity arises from the assumption of empty land (Shiva 56). This assumption is that simply because the land is empty, it is free for us to take over and do with it what we please. This assumption causes us to deny the fact that there were prior inhabitants that had prior rights (Shiva 56). Mankind has always believed that land is theirs for the taking. This is seen since we first started colonizing America. We disregard the prior life that lived in the area and make it our own. We claim the land as ours and establish boundaries. We destroy the land so that it suits our own needs. Most of what we do with the land lacks all consideration for whose home it was before. This is because we believe we are superior; our superiority makes it okay to take what we want.

http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-460/h--/q-95/sys-images/Environment/Pix/columnists/2010/8/13/1281700353348/Biodiversity-100-006.jpg

        The second cause of biodiversity being lost is “monoculture of the mind” (Shiva 57). This is simply the idea that one way is best. Shiva states that the “shutting out of alternative ways of knowing and making leads to the assumption that the dominant knowledge and techniques are the only option” (Shiva 57). I do not believe that we as a society have one way of thinking and operating. We still have both diversity in general and biodiversity. With this statement, Shiva makes it seem like our biodiversity is inexistent. However, there are a huge variety of species alive and well in the world today. In addition, we know the being diverse is better than being single-minded. We would not have made progress if we did not value the importance of diversity.

http://gallery.mailchimp.com/fe260684de28da9f9f21de43e/images/BiodiversityMatters_CMYK_Print_2_.jpg

Carson Silent Spring

    

http://www.wallcoo.net/paint/Linda_Nelson_Stocks_Folk_Art_1600x1200/images/Americana_art_painting__Old_Dog_Livery.jpg

 

       In Carson’s first excerpt, she describes a town in America where all life flourished; then, an evil spell came and killed all the beautiful life forms. At the end she states that that this town was not exist but it is similar to what happened all across America. She states that “no witchcraft, no enemy action had silenced the rebirth of new life in this world. People had done it themselves” (Carson 151). This was a powerful statement because her whole story was about an evil spell, and we find out that this “evil spell” was actually our own doing. Mankind has destroyed nature and its beauty in many ways. We had the need to control and tame every aspect of it and that it what we have done. However, destroying life is a natural effect that has come out of that. Life in many different species is faltering, plants, animals, and insects alike. Because they cannot survive in this new deadly environment we have created with all our buildings, technologies, chemicals, and pollutants. It is sad how much natural life we have lost in the progress of mankind. The more development, the less natural beauty remains. 

http://livinggreenmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/water_pollution.jpg

Mankind has not only destroyed natural life but has polluted both the land and water with dangerous materials. This pollution is essentially irrevocable because “the chain of evil it initiates not only in the world that must support life but in living tissues is for the most part irreversible” (Carson 153). The damage that we have done cannot be undone. The destruction can be fixed, but it will never be back to its original, natural state. The development, pollution, and other harmful damage we have done to the environment has either completely eliminated species or fundamentally changed the way they live. Certain ecosystems cannot be brought back naturally, but they can be artificially made. We can change the way we selfishly use and waste earth’s resources but the damage we have done is indeed irrevocable. The earth’s life can and will never be completely restored to the way it was before mankind. 

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGNn87uZ5FtdLYHMKDiF6z5cvTzyQwHAgJRLb1L86NcCBDWwktAtotPHnqLVnMhYV2gWa8SW3XASp3VjQZyY1e_yIrGTs4qlM_idHj32biflvMZdUrx_2i5KDl-S3ByygXwIxZNOXXc9c/s1600/nature+vs+city+h+milam+2.jpg

 

 

The pollution that Carson focuses in on is insect spray and its horrible effects on the environment and the entire living species. She questions how intelligent beings could seek to control a few unwanted species by “a method that contaminated the entire environment and brought the threat of disease and death even to their own kind” (Carson 156). It is a bit dramatic to make such a strong statement. Human beings are stronger and more adaptive than she is giving credit. Even through all our research, we have not figured out the complexities of the human body, its genes, and the brain. I am not saying that pesticides are not bad to use, but I am saying that I do not think they bring a huge threat of death to our kind. Carson gets too intense with this statement, but her passion for the environment and all living species is clear.  Carson is right, however, in her frustrations with how we need to control everything. Our need for control is excessive and is a huge contributor to all the development and destruction of the environment.

https://brunorodriguezq.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/urban-sprawl.jpg

http://greenoverdose.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/gmo_spray_pesticide_ah_23335.jpg

            Carson, in her dramatic streak, further states that we have subjected a huge amount of the population to contact with these poisons, often without their knowledge (Carson 160). And according to her since the Bill of Rights contains “no guarantee that a citizen shall be secure against lethal poisons distributed either by private individuals or by public officials”, it means our forefathers, despite their considerable wisdom and foresight, did not conceive of any such problem (Carson 160). Our forefathers did not conceive of such a problem because it was a completely different age. No one could predict how technologically advanced we are today. It is not fair for her to state that our forefathers were smart enough to know something like pesticides should never be created. They were creators themselves. She cannot compare their age to now and predict what their views on pesticides would be.

http://www.americanmilitiamen.com/American_Militiamen/The_United_States_Bill_Of_Rights_files/Bill%20of%20Rights%20Signers.jpg

Nature of the Everglades

http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/130/cache/aquatic-florida-everglades_13047_600x450.jpg

Immediately in this excerpt, the first section stood out to me. Douglas starts off with “there are no other Everglades in the world” (Douglas 104) and proceeds to glorify the Everglades unique beauty. She boasts that nothing is like their vast glittering openness, massive winds, and dazzling, great blue sky (Douglas 104). This section starts off the excerpt and it is a capturing, alluring beginning. It drew me in immediately and piqued my interest. It is clear from this section that Douglas both admires and loves the Everglades in its natural beauty. I enjoyed reading about what is clearly Douglas’ passion, for it is always inspiring to see an individual so passionate about what they love. I do not the Everglades or know much about them, but Douglas captured me with her strong emotions for the Everglades. Passion is a value that is really important to me.

http://geology.com/hurricanes/named-hurricane-fran.gif

 

 

 

          Nature can be great in both its good and its bad. Although nature can be great, sometimes its greatness affects us negatively. An example of this is an event that is well known to Floridians: hurricanes. Hurricanes are famous acts of nature; however, they can be extremely destructive and even deadly to not just us humans but all the other species in this habitat as well. Douglas describes the occurrence of hurricanes as “rising hot air [that] is flung into circular motion by the immeasurable spinning power of the world” (Douglas 118). It is said that the velocity of the spin has been recorded at 200 miles an hour, but no one knows their great speed because recording instruments are blown away before that (Douglas 118). The fact that a hurricane can spin over 200 miles an hour is crazy to me. Nothing is powering it except Mother Earth herself. It is a complete natural power. Hurricanes are huge, violent storms and prove that we cannot ever completely conquer nature. We can destroy the land but hurricanes prove that nature cannot be tamed, and like hurricanes, nature is not to be messed with. 

http://www.onearth.org/sites/default/files/ew-hero-image/everglades.jpg

           On Douglas 124, she describes the water in the rivers and bays as being clean and clear with only natural discolorations from either mangroves or shimmering light. She mentions the “sand reefs, sea gardens, and acres of clean green weed” (Douglas 124). This stood out to me because it made me sad to realize how much damage progress and pollution has done to this simple statement. As this work was published in 1988, there was nowhere near the amount of pollution as there is today. Now, just about every body of water is tainted because of humans. It is not natural discolorations. It is pollution and death of species because of all the pollution we make every day. Douglas was so proud when talking about the clean, clear water, and it is disheartening to know that we cannot make simple statements like this anymore. Our touch has tainted every pure water we know.

http://gifts.worldwildlife.org/gift-center/Images/large-species-photo/large-River-Otter-photo.jpg

        Last but not least, my absolute favorite section of this excerpt was the description of the otters. I love otters and always have. They are such carefree, cute animals, and it disturbs me that they could ever be trapped or hunted by a human. I would never be able to trap, hunt, or kill an innocent, playful, little otter. I really enjoyed the way Douglas describes the otters in the Everglades. The otters “swim and flirt” among the alligators and know how to “enjoy life in the sun better than all the rest of the creatures” (Douglas 145). Douglas expresses how they are extremely curious and friendly creatures that have such lively spirits, playing in the mud and having fun (Douglas 145). How a person could ever trap an otter just to make a profit is beyond me. In my eyes, this description further brought this excerpt to life. The Everglades is clearly such a unique place that is so alive with life in many forms. Humans should not touch or tamper with it.

http://www.npca.org/assets/content-images/protecting-our-parks-images/AirLandWater_Images/marineFisheries.jpg